That is when momentum can become dangerous.
After the Montreal Canadiens skated out to a 2-0 lead in their first round playoff series against the Boston Bruins, they had all the momentum in the world. But that picture has changed significantly in the last four days.
Boston won Game 3 in Montreal and the teams faced off last night for their biggest match of the season. A pivotal Game 4 in Montreal where the Habs would jump out to 1-0, 3-1 and 4-3 leads before ultimately losing 5-4 in overtime.
The win clearly swings momentum to the Bruins, with the series returning to Boston for Game 5 on Saturday night. But this game, in a lot of ways, was a microcosm of the series so far.
Final score: Bruins 5 - Habs 4 (OT)
Habs scorers: Brent Sopel (1), Mike Cammalleri (2), Andrei Kostitsyn (2), P.K. Subban (1)
Bruins scorers: Michael Ryder (1, 2), Andrew Ference (1), Patrice Bergeron (2), Chris Kelly (2)
Three stars: 1. Michael Ryder, 2. Michael Cammalleri, 3. P.K. Subban
Game Notes
60 minutes anyone?
Through four games, neither team has been able to put in a full 60-minute effort.
As such, the ball of momentum has been passed back and forth between the two teams as they trade chances, mistakes and wins.
Last night was no different with Montreal playing their best, most dominant 20-minutes of the season in the first period. The problem was that while Montreal outshot Boston 15-8, they went to the dressing room with a measly 1-0 lead.
That just isn't good enough.
By the time Andrei Kostitsyn scored the Canadiens third of the game—his second of the playoffs—Montreal was outshooting Boston 29-12. After that goal, however, the Canadiens managed only one more shot in the period with the shot count 30-22 after two and the score tied at three.
Where's the defense?
For two teams that pride themselves on a defense-first mentality they both left much to be desired.
Boston's defensive unit hasn't looked particularly good at any point during this series, while the Canadiens' have oscillated between being really good and really bad.
Last night was no different as Montreal used their speed to overwhelm Boston's defense for a good half of the game. After that, it was the Bruins turn to make the Canadiens' D look like house-leaguers.
With both teams abandoning their usual defensive schemes, the game became wide open and resembled the Bruins 8-6 defeat of the Habs a few months ago. Both goalies were left to their own devices as the teams in front of them showed horrible gap control, missed assignment and failed to clear players from in front of their nets.
The result was a back-and-forth goal-scoring bonanza of sorts, where no lead was safe and the goalies too often were made to look bad. Really exciting for the fans but the type of game the coaches hate!
Something tells me we won't soon be seeing a repeat of last night's game any time soon.
A word on goaltending
Let's be honest here, both teams seem to have the opposing goaltender figured out. During the third period intermission last night, CBC showed the shooting tendencies of both teams and it was clear they knew how to score.
Montreal continues to shoot low, hard shots from an angle that force Tim Thomas to kick out huge rebounds. The hope is for a Canadiens player to then pot these rebounds into the empty net. That worked well over the first two games but Montreal missed too many of those chances last night.
For Boston, they are going high glove side and they beat Carey Price a few times like that last night. Both Michael Ryder and Andrew Ference's goals went top shelf, glove side on Price.
Shades of the Flyers a few years ago?
As nervous and unstable as Thomas has looked for much of the series, he has outplayed Price over the last two games and that's been the difference. Last night, despite his flopping around on the ice, Thomas made several key saves that kept the Bruins in the game.
The best example was just before the overtime winning goal, where Thomas came way out of the blue paint to stop a point-blank scoring chance. Shortly after the save the puck went up the other way and the Bruins scored the winner.
As I said before the series started, if Montreal is going to win Price has to be the best goalie on the ice. He was in Games 1 and 2, but has not hit the mark in 3 and 4.
The Habs' forwards
Michael Cammalleri and David Desharnais were two of the best Habs skaters last night.
Cammalleri in particular, who did not have a great regular season, is showing once again that he is a true playoff performer. Quietly he has taken the scoring lead with seven points (2G, 5A) in four games, and is the clear offensive leader for Montreal.
As for Desharnais, he was quick, combative and causing problems for Boston all night. One shift, in particular, epitomized the kind of night he had when he went into the corner with Zdeno Chara, and came out with the puck. On another 1-on-1 battle, Desharnais actually pinned Chara along the boards until a teammate could pick up the puck.
Talk about David and Goliath!
This guy seems to be feeding off the energy of veteran players, like Brian Gionta, and flanked by Tom Pyatt and Ryan White formed an excellent trio for Montreal. All three are solid defensively, and with White hitting everything that moves and Desharnais and Pyatt using their speed, they caused a lot of havoc for the Bruins' defenders.
The Bergeron line
If players like Zdeno Chara and Milan Lucic aren't leading the charge for Boston as expected, the line of Patrice Bergeron, Brad Marchand and Mark Recchi has picked up the slack. Marchand, without a doubt, had been the Bruins best forward all series.
He is fast, gritty, a huge pain in the butt and a legitimate offensive threat. Last night, along with linemates Bergeron and Recchi, this line went to work in the second when all hope seemed lost for Boston.
After Andrei Kostitsyn made it 3-1 7:47 into the second, Bruins' coach Claude Julien called a timeout. The extra time seemed to calm the Bruins, allowing them to refocus and go after Montreal.
A strange shot from the point by Ference made it 3-2 at 9:59 in the second, handing the momentum over to Boston. Then, at 17:04, Marchand picked up a Dennis Seidenberg rebound and passed it under Price to Bergeron, who fired it into the gaping net.
3-3.
Montreal only managed one shot on goal after the Bruins timeout with Bergeron and Marchand leading the offensive charge. It's amazing to think the Bruins have been having success off of the backs of their second, and not their first line. So far, the Habs have no answer for the Bergeron line, proof positive by Brian Gionta and Scott Gomez both finishing the night at minus-3 while trying to shut them down.
The winning goal
If there is one thing we have seen through four games, it's that these two teams are very evenly matched. As such, the margin between winning and losing is minuscule. So it's no real surprise then that the game went to overtime last night.
As with the rest of this series, last night's game was decided by a mistake and opportunistic scoring.
Less than two minutes into overtime Travis Moen had the puck on the left boards and needed to dump it into the corner for a line change. But for some reason, he tried to pass it across to Gomez on the other side of the ice instead.
The problem is that he was the only one who knew he was going to do that.
As such, Brian Gionta and P.K. Subban were already headed to the bench for a change. So when the puck was turned over and the play headed back up the ice, Jaroslav Spacek was the only Canadien back to defend the subsequent 3-on-1.
With Montreal scrambling to get back, Michael Ryder—who scored two on the night—was left all alone in front to put the puck past a sprawling Price for the winner.
The winning goal was scored on a comedy of errors by Montreal in a game they could have, and probably should have won.
What's next?
Ladies and gentleman, we have a new series. A best-of-three shootout with Boston again holding home-ice advantage and the expectation of victory.
While the momentum has clearly shifted to the Bruins I don't expect them to win four straight against Montreal. Boston has yet to play well in their own building and the pressure, once again, is squarely on their shoulders.
I originally thought that Boston would win this series in six, but I now see this one going the distance instead. I can see the Bs winning Game 5, Montreal taking Game 6 and the whole thing being decided in a winner-takes-all Game 7 in Beantown.
While many are saying that the loss last night means the series is over for Montreal, I don't buy it. If the Habs have shown one thing this year it's a tremendous resilience. These guys can bounce back from anything, do not have a fragile mental makeup and have a veteran core who has been there before.
They'll shake off the back-to-back losses and bring a solid effort in Boston.
Despite this being a 2-2 series, I would say that Montreal has dominated larger stretches of play than the Bruins. The difference has been opportunistic scoring from Boston and key saves from Thomas.
Its now Montreal's turn to play that same card.
Game 5 is set for Saturday in Boston and what a game it should be!
---
Kamal is a freelance Habs writer, Senior Writer/Editor-in-Chief of HabsAddict.com, Montreal Canadiens Blogger on Hockeybuzz.com and Habs writer on TheFranchise.ca. Kamal is also a weekly contributor to the Sunday Shinny on The Team 990 (AM 990) every Sunday from 8 - 9 AM. Listen live at http://www.team990.com/
Follow Kamal on Facebook and Twitter
(Photo by Phillip MacCallum/Getty Images North America)
4 comments:
I told myself I wouldn't talk about this debacle of a game, but I'll make an exception for you, buddy.
There's ebbs and flows to a series, and a 2-2 series is probably a fair result all things considered.
The trouble is the way we've arrived at 2-2. The Bruins have won the lockdown game, and they've won the weird shoot-out...by coming from behind.
It's really not good for the Habs that they blew this game. With 3 separate leads in the game, it was a game they simply had to win, and they didn't.
I don't blame Price, but he's had to be better in the past 2 games. I won't sugarcoat or try to deflect blame to defensemen/forwards who have been making big time blunders all year. Price was stellar all season, and through 2 games in this series. In games 3 & 4, he hasn't been nearly as good, and there's nothing anybody can say that will convince me otherwise. It would be blind homerism to try and say that he's been good through the games in Montreal.
So now the Habs are forced to win 3 of 4 games in Boston. They can do it, but hope is waning.
I'm not sure if Martin was paying attention, but Spacek was awful. He made key adjustments after game 4 last year vs Washington, and if he's as bland, predictable and formulaic as we all believe him to be, he should be making key adjustments again. Spacek HAS to come out of the lineup, veteran status be damned. He's too slow and he's too immobile to be reliable. Weber should draw in his spot, end of story.
Lastly, a big thumbs up to little David Desharnais. He was drawing the ire of some, and he played his little arse off last night. He was determined and fought for every puck. HUGE respect for him.
Good stuff Kyle and thanks for posting despite the self-imposed ban! :-)
That was a terrible, terrible loss for the Habs. You make a great point about the problem not being the 2-2 series, but the way they got there. Montreal had far too many chances to put the game away last night but their defensive coverage was horrible and, as you pointed out, Price was not in top form.
I think this series could really go either way right now and while I originally picked Boston in 6, I now think this will go seven games and the Habs will pull it out.
Montreal has shown nothing this year if not a bounce-back ability. They'll shelve this game and move on.
As for Spacek, the duo of him and Sopel were terrible last night. I'd also like to see Weber in the lineup but there is no way JM is going to sit Spacek.
No way.
Either way, these teams seem very evenly matched and equally skilled and incompetent...this has the makings of a long series, imo.
The Bruins where off side on that winning goal, and Andrew Ferrence should have recieved a game misconduct for his display after scoring, and his excuse was ridiculous!!!! Thanks
Good stuff Charles...thanks for commenting!
Yep, on the replay it is clearly offside. Them's the breaks in playoff hockey sometimes. Ultimately, the Habs lost this game WAY before overtime.
As for Ference, the thing that rubs me the wrong was is he weak-assed back-peddling. It was clear what he did, he likely got reprimanded for it and changed his story to make him look better.
The $2500 fine is the maximum under the current CBA. But, if you ask me, his gesture was worse than Wisniewski's simulated fellatio gesture towards Avery that got him two games.
Why? Because Ference's gesture was directed at the fans.
However this is the playoffs and with fickle-mushheads like Bettman and Campbell running the show, what did we really expect?
Post a Comment