Saturday, June 25, 2011

Montreal Canadiens: The Season That Almost Was...

by HfxHabby


I'd like to take this opportunity to thank Kamal for giving me a shot at being a big-time writer on HabsAddict.com. I look forward to the many comments and insults which are sure to follow me on here!

Now that the formalities are out of the way, lets get down to business.

With Round One of the draft in the books writing about it seems like a logical choice for my first post. However, since it's pretty well covered on the Interweb, I thought I would pick a different topic.

So instead I give you "The Season That Almost Was".

As the entire hockey world knows, the 2010-2011 Habs made an early exit from the playoffs this year, losing in a heart-wrenching series against their long-standing nemesis, the Boston Bruins. While some say that they were outplayed, I have a few problems with that, given how good the Canadiens were this year.

Don't forget that the Montreal Canadiens won their season series against the Bruins this year, four games to two. Forget the so called Beatdown in Boston. The Habs only lost that game by two goals, remember?

They also won their games against Vancouver, two games to none. Oh and they also won their season series versus San Jose and Tampa Bay. The Canadiens really only had problems with the powerhouses in the West, and that's sort of forgivable since they hardly get to play them anymore.

I also think they would have had a fantastic shot against Philadelphia, what with the Flyers' goaltending woes and the probable return of Max Pacioretty.

When you compare the team's numbers to the Vancouver Canucks, Montreal actually looks very good.

Montreal was in a tight divisional race all season, with three teams in the Northeast making it into the post season. Vancouver, on the other hand, walked away with their division, setting the bar so high—no other team in the Northwest made the playoffs.

Montreal won 14 of their divisional games and Vancouver won 18. Not too bad considering Montreal was in a much more skilled division.

In inter-conference play, Montreal won eight games and Vancouver won 11. Again, very comparable numbers.

However, in their own respective conference Montreal not only looks good with 35 wins versus 45 for Vancouver, but if you factor in the goals-for and goals-against Montreal—had they scored maybe 20 more goals in the regular season—would have been a top shelf team.

After all, the Habs had one player over 50 points in the regular season and only three over 40.

Vancouver had five players at 50 points or more, three of them were over 70 and they even had a 104-point season from a Daniel Sedin.

A few more goals goes a long way. So does an offensive coaching style and if not offensive, then at least a little more balanced.

If Montreal had a healthier blueline—a la Josh Gorges and Andrei Markov—and a slightly bigger set of forwards—a la Pacioretty—then there is no doubt in my mind they would have gone to the big show.

But, unfortunately, the title of this piece is not "The Season that is."

So that's the way I see it but what do you think? Did Montreal have nearly all the pieces in place to drink from the Cup?

---
HfxHabby grew up just outside of Montreal and learned early on to love the Habs. His earliest hockey memory is seeing Steve Penney play in nets. Hfxhabby is currently training his young son to be a Habs fan, to his wife's dismay, and he can still name every player on the '93 Cup winning Canadiens.

(Photo by None/Getty Images North America)

6 comments:

Sorry HfxHabby
But your first column was a waste of time. If that.... and if this.... just does not make any sense, because it is only wishful dreaming not reality.
The reality was, we were filled with injuries and in the end lost. Hopefully the injury gods will target the Bruins more this coming year and less on our habs. But again that is just dreaming for now.

@Habby

hey thank you for the comment. I totally appreciate that this whole piece is wishful dreaming, but in reality, we weren't all that far off. A few more goals, a few less injuries. (which i do mention near the end of the article) and man we could have been great dont you think?

I'm sorry you were let down by my writing, but hopefully i can raise the bar for you next time out.
thanks for reading and cheers

HfxHabby

The comparisons to Vancouver are interesting. I hadn't realized their conference was so weak, but then again I don't pay much attention to the West.

I don't think there's anything wrong with the way you presented the article itself re: your writing. As for wishful thinking I don't know many Habs fans that aren't currently engaging in it.

Twitter rumours about possibly trading Gomez have been clogging my feed all day. I mean, really?

It's your first piece. You'll get your feet under you yet. :)

Thanks Tyg appreciate your feedback.
Yeah I had only heard about how thin the Northwest was myself after the Finals were over, and it brought this type of comparison to mind.

Really, if we had one less injury and maybe 20 more golas, we would have been in top in the East i think lol

Thanks again

Thanks for the thought - provoking post. I agree that a less defensive philosophy for the Habs would be beneficial but for another reason - it would allow the team D to be healthier. The healthy players would not be so over-used. Although it is like the chicken and the egg. Do they get injured because of over-use or are they over-used because of the injuries. Hmmmm.

Good article

@Laura
Yes thats really something i have wondered about all season. why were they so decimated? due to the system? or was the system Jacques Martin used a result of so many injuries?

After all, look at the first month of the season when Montreal was on a tear thru the Eastern conference. Then the wheels came off in a hurry..

Thank you for your comments :)

HH

Post a Comment