Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts

Monday, March 14, 2011

Zdeno Chara on Max Pacioretty: Media, Fans and Bloggers React

by Kamal Panesar

It has been almost a week since Zdeno Chara knocked out Max Pacioretty with a hit that has spawned coversation across the league.

Whether it is in mainstream media, blogs or just around the water cooler, the hit, which caused a severe concussion and fractured cervical vertebra, has been the talk of the league.

The NHL's subsequent ruling on the hit, choosing neither to suspend nor fine Chara for the incident, set the hockey world on fire with players, fans and media alike seemingly polarized on the issue and whether further discipline was required.

It was around that time that I sent out a Tweet, a Facebook message and an email to a few people I know, to get their reactions on the NHL's ruling. Unfortunately, I didn't recieve any response from any Bruins fans or media but I did get a ton of responses from the Habs camp.

In addition, I had a bunch of media people who didn't want me to print a quote from them since they had nothing nice and/or clean to say about the matter!

So, I have compiled some of the responses below for you to see a good cross section of how the world, at least the Habs-world, is feeling about the issue.


Bloggers and Media People

Nick Murdocco, Radio Host, The Franchise weekend morning show on the Team 990.

"My official opinion may never be known. IF Gregory Campbell ever lies motionless on the ice after a similar "hockey play" and Mike Murphy (obviously not Colin Campbell ) decide that no suspension is warranted, then I will know they were being impartial with Pacioretty’s situation. Still blind, barbaric, idiotic and disrespectful towards all players and fans, but impartial nonetheless."


Allen, from Four Habs Fans

"Really, I said it all here and I'll ask you to link to this - http://fourhabsfans.blogspot.com/2011/03/ok-get-out-pitchforks-and-torches-now.html

But here's a sentence in true FHF fashion: F**k the NHL."


Kyle Roussel, Cowhide and Rubber

"Pathetic. From the build up to the event, to the history between the two players, to the sight of the unconscious Pacioretty, to Chara hiding like a coward, and blaming the victim, to the NHL & NHLPA's response, to the Media's lack of sense, to the Canadiens not standing up for their player, this entire debacle is in a word, pathetic."


Brain La Rose, Habsworld.net

"Though I was disappointed to not see Chara get a token game or two due to the seriousness of Pacioretty's injury, I wasn't really surprised. When I saw the hit, my original suspicion was that there would be no suspension; it was just a gut feeling I had and sure enough, it turned out to be right sadly."


Leigh Anne (a.k.a. JT), The H does NOT stand for Habs

"First: There's been a great deal of debate about Chara's intent on the hit. That debate is obscuring the real issue, and that's the lack of consequences for the outcome of his action. Whether he hit Pacioretty on purpose or not is beside the point; the fact remains he seriously hurt another player and should be punished regardless of intent.

Second: There is something seriously wrong with a league in which gesturing at another player to...(perform oral sex)...gets you two games, but breaking a man's neck is a "hockey" play and not worthy of suspension. The NHL was worried young players might emulate Wisniewski's gesture, but apparently has no problem with them emulating Chara."


Eric Engels, Habs writer for CTV and Hockeybuzz.com

"Unless the players take on the role of stimulating drastic change, I've never been more sure that someone will be killed in an NHL game. It's quite clear that the owners, the league, the commissioner and those that are supposed to keep things under control care more about not offending each other than they do protecting their greatest assets: the players."


Steven Hindle, Habs and Capitals writer, Hockeybuzz.com

"Regardless of what the intent was, or who the person throwing the hit was, it was certainly something no one needs to go through.

It was frightening, but more to the point, it was violent and uncalled for. As an ambassador and role model, watching Chara throw this hit just threw me for a loop.

It's hard to argue that Zdeno isn't a respectful player, but having seen what transpired you just have to wonder what he was thinking?"


Sean Coleman, radio producer and co-host, The Team 990, via Facebook

"NHL decision is understandable, yet a touch disappointing. I was hoping for two games. Regardless, it's not as crazy of a decision as people are making it out to be."


Louis Moustakas, blogger for Habsworld.net, via Facebook

"The notion of discerning intent is ridiculous. Regardless of intent, a high-stick is always called a penalty. But when a player's career and quality life are put in jeopardy, the league washes its hands of the incident? We are not in Chara'...s head. We will never really know what he was thinking. Just like with Steckel on Crosby, actions should be punished, not some cockamamie interpretation of intent.

As for the hit itself, given Chara's immense skill, you have to imagine he had some sense of what he was doing and where he was on the ice. Add to that the frustration of losing 4-0 and the history with Pacioretty, it does not paint a pretty picture."


Fans

Rico Calzone, via Facebook

"Should have been at least two intentional or not"


Josh Hanson, via Facebook

"The league has shown that there are double standards. Gillies gets 10 for a late shoulder to shoulder check and Chara gets none for this. Your name bar determines the severity of the penalty you get. Plain and simple."


Gerry Berard, via Facebook

"I'm ashamed to be a hockey fan. I'm 57 years old and learned to love the Habs on my grandmother's knee. There's enough hate in this world; why should I look for more in a game?"


Farooq Zahir, via Facebook

"A player should always be held accountable for his actions, irrespective of the demons in his head (surely Chara has a few of those). Chara broke MaxPac's neck (a la Bertuzzi on Moore) and the NHL did nothing. That's troubling...If you run a red light and get a ticket, does the cop care why you did it? Obviously not. Similarly, if you cause someone to break his neck and almost cripple him, should you not be barred until the player you hurt comes back and plays again....?"


Bryan Willey, via Facebook

"The NHL further cemented itself as a Bush league sport. Americans don't take this seriously because there is no reason to.

Can you imagine a situation when a kid kills another man and then goes to court to Dave, his judge, who happens to be his dad? His dad outright says he cannot lay verdict however my assistant who I hand picked, will. This is the reality that is the NHL.

Wisniewski gets two games for simulating oral sex, Gillies gets 10 games for a late shoulder-to-shoulder hit but Chara, who undeniably hits Pacioretty behind his head and rams his face into a partition, is deemed a good old hockey play.

Congrats NHL on your continuous a**-clownery and inability to ever be taken seriously."


@alexheddle, via Twitter

"plyrs need to b held responsible for their actions on ice. accidental or not, they r responsible for knowing their surroundings"


@Habfan4ever, via Twitter

"Clearly Chara got his hands up and is worse than Gillies by far. Retribution to come."


@dayvee55,, via Twitter

"I'm done with the NHL.The goofballs are running the show,players and management."


@derekdonais, via Twitter

"If it wasn't such a disgusting incident, I'd say it was laughable. An opinion based on a thorough review of his job security." (re: Mike Murphy's decision not to suspend Chara)


@habs89, via Twitter

"NHL's Message - play in the league 13 seasons without suspension and you're free to do what you want to people. Not taking...a player's no suspension history into account means he'll never have a history! NHL is a joke..."


@DannyConcister, via Twitter

"The @NHL will never do anything until someone dies. There's my response."


@MikeGasse, via Twitter

"Six games for insulting a players' gf, two games for a (BJ) gesture...concussion and broken neck: nothing. What a joke.


@Dgrdnr, via Twitter

"The league is not protecting it's players. The judgement should have been based on consequences, not intent.


@dereklachine, via Twitter

"Go on any forum right now. Not just CH Fans are calling for suspension: TOR, PHI, EVEN Bruins are. A sad day for all NHL fans."


@mcdonellm, via Twitter

"Colin Campbell has a conflict of interest with the bruins."


@Mark_Haughey, via Twitter

"Disgusting decision, if Habs player takes matters into own hands next game I guarantee they will be suspended."


@PlaneteSFG55, via Twitter

"Im honestly waiting for the NHL to come out and say "ok, ok, we were just joking guys! u didnt think we were serious, did u?"


@Sheldon_egg, via Twitter

"Typical NHL ruling. No anger or surprise here. Another dropped ball by a Mickey Mouse league. At least Patches is gonna be ok."


@shmitzysays, via Twitter

"Funny, because I personally thought the near death part kind of ruined a good hockey game. Silly me."


@KingofRoncy, via Twitter

"ADD in to the article that the #nhl has to look at a safer stanchion perhaps angled to deflect or better padded?"


@Ayan_SB, via Twitter

"Chara for the Lady Byng award!"


@Habs514, via Twitter

"As I just tweeted, Avery and Wiz's actions were seen more horribly than Chara's. NHL is about image. Not about the players."


@RoseyLaRose78, via Twitter

"Decision bothers and makes me question the #NHL. They want hits to head gone, but guess not. Fails like this = bad retribution."


@Jeffery_James, via Twitter

"Chara meant to interfere and the consequence was a serious injury! Appalled there's no discipline."


@greysonknutson, via Twitter

"Just cuz it's a bad spot on the ice doesn't mean Chara didn't know what he was doing. Unbelievable, poor Patches, not fair."


@gmjrb, via Twitter

"I'm going to take a break from the NHL for a while. Here in Kitchener, that'll be easy. Its all Leafs all the time."


@despisethesun, via Twitter

"Absolutely disgusting. No other hockey league would've let it go w/out discipline. The @NHL doesn't care about player safety."


@hirky13, via Twitter

"The ruling is ridiculous, just ask the Wiz, who was disciplined for a 'hand gesture'."


@Neweradisco87, via Twitter

"Unbelievable. The NHL's priority is not what is best for players but for themselves. Does someone need to die for change?"


@crussellp, via Twitter

"Time for Gary Bettman, Murphy and Campbell to take in a game in MTL. #NewMTLRiots"


@SeriousFan09, via Twitter

"My short response, the NHL is simply corrupt and doesn't care about player health. They think nearly dying makes Good TV."


@llwillia, via Twitter

"Today is a watershed moment for the #nhl. They had the opportunity to do the right thing and lead by example and failed."


@onewayforever, via Twitter

"Not attending nor watching a NHL game until next season. This one is over anyway."


So the people have spoken and we know how they feel. What I want to know from you is with all the momentum building to change with the way the NHL deals with these head shots and concussions, what, if anything, do you think will be the ultimate outcome?

The GM meetings are taking place in Florida and this issue is at the top of the list. So what will the league do? What should they do?

Will they implement new rules? Tougher regulation? Stiffer suspension?

---
Kamal is a freelance Habs writer, Senior Writer/Editor-in-Chief of HabsAddict.com, Montreal Canadiens Blogger on Hockeybuzz.com and Habs writer on TheFranchise.ca. Kamal is also a weekly contributor to the Sunday Shinny on The Team 990 (AM 990) every Sunday from 8 - 9 AM. Listen live at http://www.team990.com/

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Miffed with Twitter...

Image representing Twitter as depicted in Crun...Image via CrunchBase

Well if you haven't noticed by now, HabsAddict.com's Twitter account has been suspended 'due to suspicious activity'. When I first realized that the account was suspended, my thought was "why?"

I am a syndicated hockey writer who uses Twitter as part of the dissemination plan of the HabsAddict.com content. In addition to pushing links to content from HabsAddict.com through Twitter, I also use the service to send in-game Tweets - and there is a game in three hours!

That being said, I was naturally surprised when they account was suspended so I looked into the reasons for it. Apparently, the suspension was due to 'excessive following or follower churning'. This immediately made a light bulb go off in my head.

For the last week or so, I have been laid out in bed with an incredibly bad back. Without getting into all of the details, I have a compressed disc and a stress fracture on one of my vertebrae. As a result, I can't walk, sit or put any load on my spine. As such, I have had a tremendous amount of time on my hands and decided to put that time to good use.

Seeing as I am using Twitter solely for the purposes of talking about the Montreal Canadiens hockey team, I decided I would go out and try to follow as many Habs fans as I could find. So naturally, the first place I started was with the most popular Habs blogger who's name will be left unsaid - for obvious publicity reasons! What I did was follow almost all of HIS followers (approx 2K people) so that I could start to get a feel for the pulse of Habs fans out there. The problem, that I soon learned, was that not all of them Tweet and not all of them Tweet about the Habs. As such, many of them were not users that I felt I should be following.

So, after a few days, I went into my account and began to unfollow a bunch of them. The net result was that I went from following around 2K people to following around 500 people.

My next step was to check out the followers of the #1 Montreal-based newspaper's Twitter account - The Montreal Gazette. The Gazette has its own Montreal Canadiens specific site called Habs Inside/Out - and a Twitter account to go along with it. So I followed the same protocol and started following as many of the Habs Inside/Out followers. When I got to around 1600 followers, I had reached my limit for the day so I stopped. Little did I know, that this behaviour is "suspicious" and/or suspension worthy. This is what is known, in the Twitterverse, as 'excessive following or follower churning'.

What I believe happened, is that there was an overlap between the users following the Habs Blogger and the users following the newspaper. I believe that following, then unfollowing, then refollowing these users is what triggered the suspension of my Twitter account.

I had NO idea and honesty didn't even think about it at the time but now that my account is suspended, I understand their logic. Excessive user following/churning probably puts a huge amount of unnecessary load on their servers, which they likely frown upon.

Make sense to me. Mea Culpa. Sorry, sorry, sorry.

Anyway, I filled in their "please unsuspend my account" form and got an automated email response back tell me that "...We will do our best to get back to you within 30 days..."

Ummm, what?

30 days? Are you freakin' kidding me?

Twitter is an essential part of the HabsAddict.com and helps me stay in touch with Habs fans, see what they are talking about and push new content out. It is a corner stone to the social networking web that has made HabsAddict.com successful. So yes, I understand the reasons for suspending the account but I now have to wait up to 30 days before they do anything? Does this not seem completely unacceptable to anyone else?

I am not a spammer, I am not an abusive user and I actually have a pretty decent following right now. HabsAddict.com deos not exist without its fans and Twitter is telling me that I might be cut off from that fan base for up to 30 days.

Ridiculous, in my opinion. But there is nothing that I can seemingly do as I tried, in vain, to find a phone number or email address ANYWHERE on the Twitter site but found that none exist.

So now, with less than three hours till the Montreal Canadiens play the Ottawa Senators in Ottawa, I have no way of reaching out to the fan base. I have no way to provide them with the in-game Tweets that they have become used to and I feel completly cut off.

Sucks, but I'm just one guy who is trying to provide content to people who want it while Twitter is 'the man'. They have me bent over a barrel, lube in hand, and are choosing not to use it.

Sigh. Not much to do, I guess, except wait for Godot.

Blech.

K.